Today on Sprout Insights...

Author: John is a freelance photographer, writer, and traveler based out of Chicago. He is a graduate of the Pratt Institute with a BA in Visual Communications. Before joining Sprout, John previously worked for Apple Inc. as a lead creative and business associate. He likes old Polaroid cameras, New York style pizza, and typing in the third person. Connect with him on Twitter: @localcelebrity

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
KirkLashley 5 pts

Although the branding is confusing in AT&T's case, it's part of a technical limitation of Twitter accounts with a limit of 1000 tweets a day and 250 DMs. So for companies using Twitter as a customer service platform they have to live within that limitation or find creative ways around it. Zaarly, FastCompany and even CNN are examples of other companies that find creative ways around the limit, by either splitting out their persona based on a sub-brand or geography.

https://support.twitter.com/articles/15364-about-twitter-limits-update-api-dm-and-following

williamevents 5 pts

Very interesting post. When I work with clients I try to get them to understand the messages and the types of communication they want to have. Then to start talking about the number of twitter accounts they have. I find that is the best way to go about it.

Conversation from Facebook

Sprout Social
Sprout Social

@Shannon - I think it depends on the company, mostly. But I tend to prefer a simpler approach. More accounts means a higher possibility that customers will get confused, not sure who to tweet, and require your team redirect customers to the appropriate channel. I think creating separate accounts for different locations could be a case where multiple handles would make sense though!

Sprout Social
Sprout Social

Excellent input, Greg! It can be a tough spot to be in and really takes knowing your business, your audience, and their needs. I have seen some brands consolidate accounts by changing their bios to "Please find us at @newhandle" and occasionally posting updates to redirect followers to the preferred account. That could mean losing a good portion of your audience though. But if they aren't engaged whatsoever, are they necessarily the followers you want?

Greg Tirico
Greg Tirico

Your article has generated good conversation today. Thank you! This is a tough issue for corporations. As we all rushed to setup Twitter accounts, proliferation was very common (Altimeter has done a great job of documenting this). Now that we have a chance to take a step back and really analyze our needs and our audience (collectively speaking) the choice is difficult as the consolidation of Twitter accounts, without walking away from the followers that were built, is not typically an option. What's a company to do? Shut down Twitter accounts and hope that the audience figures it out? Or continue to manage the accounts that exist while controlling any future proliferation? It's a tough call.

Shannon Horton
Shannon Horton

What other ones do you suggest?

Sprout Social
Sprout Social

Depending on the company, that could be a great strategy!

Shannon Horton
Shannon Horton

3 might be a good number. Main, customer service, and r&d

Click to comment on the full site